Linear trendline:wrong equation

1. Linear trendline:wrong equation

Hi,

I created a bar chart in Excel from the following data:

X Y
73 6.6
78 5.7
86 4.8

The SLOPE and the INTERCEPT functions returned -0.136 and 16.4448
respectively. The resulting equation is Y = -0.136X + 16.448 which seems good
enough to me.

Then I added a linear trendline to the chart. Excel displayed the following
equation: Y = -0.9X + 7.5, R ^2 =1 which is way off (and it's not a rounding
problem)!!!

The data seemed farly linear to me, how come Excel can't come up with the
right equation???

Thanks

Jan M.

2. RE: Linear trendline:wrong equation

Use an "XY (Scatter)" chart.

When you selected a "Line" chart, you (by definition) told Excel that your
x-axis was categorical instead of numeric, and that what you provided for the
x-axis was a set of category labels that may or may not have numeric values.
Why Excel would offer to fit a trendline in that circumstance is a mystery to
me, but when it does, it uses x-values of 1,2,3,... and correctly calculates
the regression of y against those assumed x-values.

Jerry

"Jan M." wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I created a bar chart in Excel from the following data:
>
> X Y
> 73 6.6
> 78 5.7
> 86 4.8
>
> The SLOPE and the INTERCEPT functions returned -0.136 and 16.4448
> respectively. The resulting equation is Y = -0.136X + 16.448 which seems good
> enough to me.
>
> Then I added a linear trendline to the chart. Excel displayed the following
> equation: Y = -0.9X + 7.5, R ^2 =1 which is way off (and it's not a rounding
> problem)!!!
>
> The data seemed farly linear to me, how come Excel can't come up with the
> right equation???
>
> Thanks
>
> Jan M.
>
>

3. RE: Linear trendline:wrong equation

Similarly, the bar and column charts assume that the x-axis is non-numerica
categories to be treated as 1,2,3,... if a trendline is requested.

Excel provides no chart type that plots bar heights/lengths against a
numberic axis.

Jerry

"Jerry W. Lewis" wrote:

> Use an "XY (Scatter)" chart.
>
> When you selected a "Line" chart, you (by definition) told Excel that your
> x-axis was categorical instead of numeric, and that what you provided for the
> x-axis was a set of category labels that may or may not have numeric values.
> Why Excel would offer to fit a trendline in that circumstance is a mystery to
> me, but when it does, it uses x-values of 1,2,3,... and correctly calculates
> the regression of y against those assumed x-values.
>
> Jerry
>
> "Jan M." wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I created a bar chart in Excel from the following data:
> >
> > X Y
> > 73 6.6
> > 78 5.7
> > 86 4.8
> >
> > The SLOPE and the INTERCEPT functions returned -0.136 and 16.4448
> > respectively. The resulting equation is Y = -0.136X + 16.448 which seems good
> > enough to me.
> >
> > Then I added a linear trendline to the chart. Excel displayed the following
> > equation: Y = -0.9X + 7.5, R ^2 =1 which is way off (and it's not a rounding
> > problem)!!!
> >
> > The data seemed farly linear to me, how come Excel can't come up with the
> > right equation???
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Jan M.
> >
> >

4. RE: Linear trendline:wrong equation

Jerry,

You are right about excel using 1,2,3 as x-values: I hadn't figured that one
out!

What do you mean by an "XY (Scatter)" chart? I'm still missing something
here: What should I do differently to have excel give me the right equation?

Thanks

"Jerry W. Lewis" wrote:

> Use an "XY (Scatter)" chart.
>
> When you selected a "Line" chart, you (by definition) told Excel that your
> x-axis was categorical instead of numeric, and that what you provided for the
> x-axis was a set of category labels that may or may not have numeric values.
> Why Excel would offer to fit a trendline in that circumstance is a mystery to
> me, but when it does, it uses x-values of 1,2,3,... and correctly calculates
> the regression of y against those assumed x-values.
>
> Jerry
>
> "Jan M." wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I created a bar chart in Excel from the following data:
> >
> > X Y
> > 73 6.6
> > 78 5.7
> > 86 4.8
> >
> > The SLOPE and the INTERCEPT functions returned -0.136 and 16.4448
> > respectively. The resulting equation is Y = -0.136X + 16.448 which seems good
> > enough to me.
> >
> > Then I added a linear trendline to the chart. Excel displayed the following
> > equation: Y = -0.9X + 7.5, R ^2 =1 which is way off (and it's not a rounding
> > problem)!!!
> >
> > The data seemed farly linear to me, how come Excel can't come up with the
> > right equation???
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Jan M.
> >
> >

5. RE: Linear trendline:wrong equation

Jerry,

I think I've figured out what your meant by "xy scatter"!
I modified my data table the following way and got the right results:

X Y
73 6.6
74
75
76
77
78 5.8
.... ...

Jan M.

"Jerry W. Lewis" wrote:

> Use an "XY (Scatter)" chart.
>
> When you selected a "Line" chart, you (by definition) told Excel that your
> x-axis was categorical instead of numeric, and that what you provided for the
> x-axis was a set of category labels that may or may not have numeric values.
> Why Excel would offer to fit a trendline in that circumstance is a mystery to
> me, but when it does, it uses x-values of 1,2,3,... and correctly calculates
> the regression of y against those assumed x-values.
>
> Jerry
>
> "Jan M." wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I created a bar chart in Excel from the following data:
> >
> > X Y
> > 73 6.6
> > 78 5.7
> > 86 4.8
> >
> > The SLOPE and the INTERCEPT functions returned -0.136 and 16.4448
> > respectively. The resulting equation is Y = -0.136X + 16.448 which seems good
> > enough to me.
> >
> > Then I added a linear trendline to the chart. Excel displayed the following
> > equation: Y = -0.9X + 7.5, R ^2 =1 which is way off (and it's not a rounding
> > problem)!!!
> >
> > The data seemed farly linear to me, how come Excel can't come up with the
> > right equation???
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Jan M.
> >
> >

6. Re: Linear trendline:wrong equation

What Jerry means is don't use a column chart. It is the wrong kind of chart
to use to show relationships between two variables, even if you are not
trying to generate statistics on it. Rebuild the chart and select one of the
XY subtypes in step 1 of the chart wizard, or convert the chart using Chart
Type on the Chart menu. There's no need to mess around with the data range.

- Jon
-------
Jon Peltier, Microsoft Excel MVP
Peltier Technical Services
Tutorials and Custom Solutions
http://PeltierTech.com/
_______

"Jan M." <JanM@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:F53C98AA-0D52-4238-B05C-8139A27C7B3E@microsoft.com...
> Jerry,
>
> I think I've figured out what your meant by "xy scatter"!
> I modified my data table the following way and got the right results:
>
> X Y
> 73 6.6
> 74
> 75
> 76
> 77
> 78 5.8
> ... ...
>
>
> Jan M.
>
>
>
> "Jerry W. Lewis" wrote:
>
>> Use an "XY (Scatter)" chart.
>>
>> When you selected a "Line" chart, you (by definition) told Excel that
>> your
>> x-axis was categorical instead of numeric, and that what you provided for
>> the
>> x-axis was a set of category labels that may or may not have numeric
>> values.
>> Why Excel would offer to fit a trendline in that circumstance is a
>> mystery to
>> me, but when it does, it uses x-values of 1,2,3,... and correctly
>> calculates
>> the regression of y against those assumed x-values.
>>
>> Jerry
>>
>> "Jan M." wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I created a bar chart in Excel from the following data:
>> >
>> > X Y
>> > 73 6.6
>> > 78 5.7
>> > 86 4.8
>> >
>> > The SLOPE and the INTERCEPT functions returned -0.136 and 16.4448
>> > respectively. The resulting equation is Y = -0.136X + 16.448 which
>> > seems good
>> > enough to me.
>> >
>> > Then I added a linear trendline to the chart. Excel displayed the
>> > following
>> > equation: Y = -0.9X + 7.5, R ^2 =1 which is way off (and it's not a
>> > rounding
>> > problem)!!!
>> >
>> > The data seemed farly linear to me, how come Excel can't come up with
>> > the
>> > right equation???
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> >
>> > Jan M.
>> >
>> >

7. Re: Linear trendline:wrong equation

Jon,

I've tried changing the chart type with no results. What is it that you call
an XY subtype? It may seems trivial to you, but I assure you that it is not
to me (maybe because I'm using a french version).

Thanks.

Jan M.

"Jon Peltier" wrote:

> What Jerry means is don't use a column chart. It is the wrong kind of chart
> to use to show relationships between two variables, even if you are not
> trying to generate statistics on it. Rebuild the chart and select one of the
> XY subtypes in step 1 of the chart wizard, or convert the chart using Chart
> Type on the Chart menu. There's no need to mess around with the data range.
>
> - Jon
> -------
> Jon Peltier, Microsoft Excel MVP
> Peltier Technical Services
> Tutorials and Custom Solutions
> http://PeltierTech.com/
> _______
>
> "Jan M." <JanM@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:F53C98AA-0D52-4238-B05C-8139A27C7B3E@microsoft.com...
> > Jerry,
> >
> > I think I've figured out what your meant by "xy scatter"!
> > I modified my data table the following way and got the right results:
> >
> > X Y
> > 73 6.6
> > 74
> > 75
> > 76
> > 77
> > 78 5.8
> > ... ...
> >
> > Thanks for your help.
> >
> > Jan M.
> >
> >
> >
> > "Jerry W. Lewis" wrote:
> >
> >> Use an "XY (Scatter)" chart.
> >>
> >> When you selected a "Line" chart, you (by definition) told Excel that
> >> your
> >> x-axis was categorical instead of numeric, and that what you provided for
> >> the
> >> x-axis was a set of category labels that may or may not have numeric
> >> values.
> >> Why Excel would offer to fit a trendline in that circumstance is a
> >> mystery to
> >> me, but when it does, it uses x-values of 1,2,3,... and correctly
> >> calculates
> >> the regression of y against those assumed x-values.
> >>
> >> Jerry
> >>
> >> "Jan M." wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > I created a bar chart in Excel from the following data:
> >> >
> >> > X Y
> >> > 73 6.6
> >> > 78 5.7
> >> > 86 4.8
> >> >
> >> > The SLOPE and the INTERCEPT functions returned -0.136 and 16.4448
> >> > respectively. The resulting equation is Y = -0.136X + 16.448 which
> >> > seems good
> >> > enough to me.
> >> >
> >> > Then I added a linear trendline to the chart. Excel displayed the
> >> > following
> >> > equation: Y = -0.9X + 7.5, R ^2 =1 which is way off (and it's not a
> >> > rounding
> >> > problem)!!!
> >> >
> >> > The data seemed farly linear to me, how come Excel can't come up with
> >> > the
> >> > right equation???
> >> >
> >> > Thanks
> >> >
> >> > Jan M.
> >> >
> >> >

>
>
>

8. Re: Linear trendline:wrong equation

Okay, I'll try to type more slowly. That's a joke.

In step 1 of the Chart Wizard, or in the Chart Type dialog, the top five
chart types in the left list are Column, Bar, Line, Pie, and XY. Select the
fifth (XY) as the chart type. Even in the French version, I'm sure the icons
are in the same order.

- Jon
-------
Jon Peltier, Microsoft Excel MVP
Peltier Technical Services
Tutorials and Custom Solutions
http://PeltierTech.com/
_______

"Jan M." <JanM@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:E884BF02-32E5-491C-B9F6-C762E00F417A@microsoft.com...
> Jon,
>
>
> I've tried changing the chart type with no results. What is it that you
> call
> an XY subtype? It may seems trivial to you, but I assure you that it is
> not
> to me (maybe because I'm using a french version).
>
> Thanks.
>
> Jan M.
>
>
> "Jon Peltier" wrote:
>
>> What Jerry means is don't use a column chart. It is the wrong kind of
>> chart
>> to use to show relationships between two variables, even if you are not
>> trying to generate statistics on it. Rebuild the chart and select one of
>> the
>> XY subtypes in step 1 of the chart wizard, or convert the chart using
>> Chart
>> Type on the Chart menu. There's no need to mess around with the data
>> range.
>>
>> - Jon
>> -------
>> Jon Peltier, Microsoft Excel MVP
>> Peltier Technical Services
>> Tutorials and Custom Solutions
>> http://PeltierTech.com/
>> _______
>>
>> "Jan M." <JanM@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> news:F53C98AA-0D52-4238-B05C-8139A27C7B3E@microsoft.com...
>> > Jerry,
>> >
>> > I think I've figured out what your meant by "xy scatter"!
>> > I modified my data table the following way and got the right results:
>> >
>> > X Y
>> > 73 6.6
>> > 74
>> > 75
>> > 76
>> > 77
>> > 78 5.8
>> > ... ...
>> >
>> > Thanks for your help.
>> >
>> > Jan M.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > "Jerry W. Lewis" wrote:
>> >
>> >> Use an "XY (Scatter)" chart.
>> >>
>> >> When you selected a "Line" chart, you (by definition) told Excel that
>> >> your
>> >> x-axis was categorical instead of numeric, and that what you provided
>> >> for
>> >> the
>> >> x-axis was a set of category labels that may or may not have numeric
>> >> values.
>> >> Why Excel would offer to fit a trendline in that circumstance is a
>> >> mystery to
>> >> me, but when it does, it uses x-values of 1,2,3,... and correctly
>> >> calculates
>> >> the regression of y against those assumed x-values.
>> >>
>> >> Jerry
>> >>
>> >> "Jan M." wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Hi,
>> >> >
>> >> > I created a bar chart in Excel from the following data:
>> >> >
>> >> > X Y
>> >> > 73 6.6
>> >> > 78 5.7
>> >> > 86 4.8
>> >> >
>> >> > The SLOPE and the INTERCEPT functions returned -0.136 and 16.4448
>> >> > respectively. The resulting equation is Y = -0.136X + 16.448 which
>> >> > seems good
>> >> > enough to me.
>> >> >
>> >> > Then I added a linear trendline to the chart. Excel displayed the
>> >> > following
>> >> > equation: Y = -0.9X + 7.5, R ^2 =1 which is way off (and it's not a
>> >> > rounding
>> >> > problem)!!!
>> >> >
>> >> > The data seemed farly linear to me, how come Excel can't come up
>> >> > with
>> >> > the
>> >> > right equation???
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks
>> >> >
>> >> > Jan M.
>> >> >
>> >> >

>>
>>
>>

9. Re: Linear trendline:wrong equation

Jon and Jerry,

I've found the XY (Scatter)! In a french version it is called "Nuages de
points" (Clouds of dots). Very poetic isn't it?

Thanks to both of you.

Jan M.

"Jon Peltier" wrote:

> What Jerry means is don't use a column chart. It is the wrong kind of chart
> to use to show relationships between two variables, even if you are not
> trying to generate statistics on it. Rebuild the chart and select one of the
> XY subtypes in step 1 of the chart wizard, or convert the chart using Chart
> Type on the Chart menu. There's no need to mess around with the data range.
>
> - Jon
> -------
> Jon Peltier, Microsoft Excel MVP
> Peltier Technical Services
> Tutorials and Custom Solutions
> http://PeltierTech.com/
> _______
>
> "Jan M." <JanM@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:F53C98AA-0D52-4238-B05C-8139A27C7B3E@microsoft.com...
> > Jerry,
> >
> > I think I've figured out what your meant by "xy scatter"!
> > I modified my data table the following way and got the right results:
> >
> > X Y
> > 73 6.6
> > 74
> > 75
> > 76
> > 77
> > 78 5.8
> > ... ...
> >
> > Thanks for your help.
> >
> > Jan M.
> >
> >
> >
> > "Jerry W. Lewis" wrote:
> >
> >> Use an "XY (Scatter)" chart.
> >>
> >> When you selected a "Line" chart, you (by definition) told Excel that
> >> your
> >> x-axis was categorical instead of numeric, and that what you provided for
> >> the
> >> x-axis was a set of category labels that may or may not have numeric
> >> values.
> >> Why Excel would offer to fit a trendline in that circumstance is a
> >> mystery to
> >> me, but when it does, it uses x-values of 1,2,3,... and correctly
> >> calculates
> >> the regression of y against those assumed x-values.
> >>
> >> Jerry
> >>
> >> "Jan M." wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > I created a bar chart in Excel from the following data:
> >> >
> >> > X Y
> >> > 73 6.6
> >> > 78 5.7
> >> > 86 4.8
> >> >
> >> > The SLOPE and the INTERCEPT functions returned -0.136 and 16.4448
> >> > respectively. The resulting equation is Y = -0.136X + 16.448 which
> >> > seems good
> >> > enough to me.
> >> >
> >> > Then I added a linear trendline to the chart. Excel displayed the
> >> > following
> >> > equation: Y = -0.9X + 7.5, R ^2 =1 which is way off (and it's not a
> >> > rounding
> >> > problem)!!!
> >> >
> >> > The data seemed farly linear to me, how come Excel can't come up with
> >> > the
> >> > right equation???
> >> >
> >> > Thanks
> >> >
> >> > Jan M.
> >> >
> >> >

>
>
>

10. Re: Linear trendline:wrong equation

Very nice. Is that what Frenchmen call it, or is that just Microsoft's
unique translation?

- Jon
-------
Jon Peltier, Microsoft Excel MVP
Peltier Technical Services
Tutorials and Custom Solutions
http://PeltierTech.com/
_______

"Jan M." <JanM@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:488EE8AA-FC5E-482F-B784-2429873D2F7F@microsoft.com...
> Jon and Jerry,
>
> I've found the XY (Scatter)! In a french version it is called "Nuages de
> points" (Clouds of dots). Very poetic isn't it?
>
> Thanks to both of you.
>
> Jan M.
>
>
>
> "Jon Peltier" wrote:
>
>> What Jerry means is don't use a column chart. It is the wrong kind of
>> chart
>> to use to show relationships between two variables, even if you are not
>> trying to generate statistics on it. Rebuild the chart and select one of
>> the
>> XY subtypes in step 1 of the chart wizard, or convert the chart using
>> Chart
>> Type on the Chart menu. There's no need to mess around with the data
>> range.
>>
>> - Jon
>> -------
>> Jon Peltier, Microsoft Excel MVP
>> Peltier Technical Services
>> Tutorials and Custom Solutions
>> http://PeltierTech.com/
>> _______
>>
>> "Jan M." <JanM@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> news:F53C98AA-0D52-4238-B05C-8139A27C7B3E@microsoft.com...
>> > Jerry,
>> >
>> > I think I've figured out what your meant by "xy scatter"!
>> > I modified my data table the following way and got the right results:
>> >
>> > X Y
>> > 73 6.6
>> > 74
>> > 75
>> > 76
>> > 77
>> > 78 5.8
>> > ... ...
>> >
>> > Thanks for your help.
>> >
>> > Jan M.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > "Jerry W. Lewis" wrote:
>> >
>> >> Use an "XY (Scatter)" chart.
>> >>
>> >> When you selected a "Line" chart, you (by definition) told Excel that
>> >> your
>> >> x-axis was categorical instead of numeric, and that what you provided
>> >> for
>> >> the
>> >> x-axis was a set of category labels that may or may not have numeric
>> >> values.
>> >> Why Excel would offer to fit a trendline in that circumstance is a
>> >> mystery to
>> >> me, but when it does, it uses x-values of 1,2,3,... and correctly
>> >> calculates
>> >> the regression of y against those assumed x-values.
>> >>
>> >> Jerry
>> >>
>> >> "Jan M." wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Hi,
>> >> >
>> >> > I created a bar chart in Excel from the following data:
>> >> >
>> >> > X Y
>> >> > 73 6.6
>> >> > 78 5.7
>> >> > 86 4.8
>> >> >
>> >> > The SLOPE and the INTERCEPT functions returned -0.136 and 16.4448
>> >> > respectively. The resulting equation is Y = -0.136X + 16.448 which
>> >> > seems good
>> >> > enough to me.
>> >> >
>> >> > Then I added a linear trendline to the chart. Excel displayed the
>> >> > following
>> >> > equation: Y = -0.9X + 7.5, R ^2 =1 which is way off (and it's not a
>> >> > rounding
>> >> > problem)!!!
>> >> >
>> >> > The data seemed farly linear to me, how come Excel can't come up
>> >> > with
>> >> > the
>> >> > right equation???
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks
>> >> >
>> >> > Jan M.
>> >> >
>> >> >

>>
>>
>>

11. Re: Linear trendline:wrong equation

Jon,

I can't speak for others, but I'm not aware of anyone calling a graph a
"cloud"!

Jan.

"Jon Peltier" wrote:

> Very nice. Is that what Frenchmen call it, or is that just Microsoft's
> unique translation?
>
> - Jon
> -------
> Jon Peltier, Microsoft Excel MVP
> Peltier Technical Services
> Tutorials and Custom Solutions
> http://PeltierTech.com/
> _______
>
>
> "Jan M." <JanM@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:488EE8AA-FC5E-482F-B784-2429873D2F7F@microsoft.com...
> > Jon and Jerry,
> >
> > I've found the XY (Scatter)! In a french version it is called "Nuages de
> > points" (Clouds of dots). Very poetic isn't it?
> >
> > Thanks to both of you.
> >
> > Jan M.
> >
> >
> >
> > "Jon Peltier" wrote:
> >
> >> What Jerry means is don't use a column chart. It is the wrong kind of
> >> chart
> >> to use to show relationships between two variables, even if you are not
> >> trying to generate statistics on it. Rebuild the chart and select one of
> >> the
> >> XY subtypes in step 1 of the chart wizard, or convert the chart using
> >> Chart
> >> Type on the Chart menu. There's no need to mess around with the data
> >> range.
> >>
> >> - Jon
> >> -------
> >> Jon Peltier, Microsoft Excel MVP
> >> Peltier Technical Services
> >> Tutorials and Custom Solutions
> >> http://PeltierTech.com/
> >> _______
> >>
> >> "Jan M." <JanM@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> >> news:F53C98AA-0D52-4238-B05C-8139A27C7B3E@microsoft.com...
> >> > Jerry,
> >> >
> >> > I think I've figured out what your meant by "xy scatter"!
> >> > I modified my data table the following way and got the right results:
> >> >
> >> > X Y
> >> > 73 6.6
> >> > 74
> >> > 75
> >> > 76
> >> > 77
> >> > 78 5.8
> >> > ... ...
> >> >
> >> > Thanks for your help.
> >> >
> >> > Jan M.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > "Jerry W. Lewis" wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Use an "XY (Scatter)" chart.
> >> >>
> >> >> When you selected a "Line" chart, you (by definition) told Excel that
> >> >> your
> >> >> x-axis was categorical instead of numeric, and that what you provided
> >> >> for
> >> >> the
> >> >> x-axis was a set of category labels that may or may not have numeric
> >> >> values.
> >> >> Why Excel would offer to fit a trendline in that circumstance is a
> >> >> mystery to
> >> >> me, but when it does, it uses x-values of 1,2,3,... and correctly
> >> >> calculates
> >> >> the regression of y against those assumed x-values.
> >> >>
> >> >> Jerry
> >> >>
> >> >> "Jan M." wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> > Hi,
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I created a bar chart in Excel from the following data:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > X Y
> >> >> > 73 6.6
> >> >> > 78 5.7
> >> >> > 86 4.8
> >> >> >
> >> >> > The SLOPE and the INTERCEPT functions returned -0.136 and 16.4448
> >> >> > respectively. The resulting equation is Y = -0.136X + 16.448 which
> >> >> > seems good
> >> >> > enough to me.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Then I added a linear trendline to the chart. Excel displayed the
> >> >> > following
> >> >> > equation: Y = -0.9X + 7.5, R ^2 =1 which is way off (and it's not a
> >> >> > rounding
> >> >> > problem)!!!
> >> >> >
> >> >> > The data seemed farly linear to me, how come Excel can't come up
> >> >> > with
> >> >> > the
> >> >> > right equation???
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Thanks
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Jan M.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>

>
>
>

12. Re: Linear trendline:wrong equation

What's the word for snow, "neige"? Maybe that's the word they wanted, thing

- Jon
-------
Jon Peltier, Microsoft Excel MVP
Peltier Technical Services
Tutorials and Custom Solutions
http://PeltierTech.com/
_______

"Jan M." <JanM@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:A3FDEB5D-014D-47CC-BE5F-980441A110DF@microsoft.com...
> Jon,
>
> I can't speak for others, but I'm not aware of anyone calling a graph a
> "cloud"!
>
> Jan.
>
> "Jon Peltier" wrote:
>
>> Very nice. Is that what Frenchmen call it, or is that just Microsoft's
>> unique translation?
>>
>> - Jon
>> -------
>> Jon Peltier, Microsoft Excel MVP
>> Peltier Technical Services
>> Tutorials and Custom Solutions
>> http://PeltierTech.com/
>> _______
>>
>>
>> "Jan M." <JanM@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> news:488EE8AA-FC5E-482F-B784-2429873D2F7F@microsoft.com...
>> > Jon and Jerry,
>> >
>> > I've found the XY (Scatter)! In a french version it is called "Nuages
>> > de
>> > points" (Clouds of dots). Very poetic isn't it?
>> >
>> > Thanks to both of you.
>> >
>> > Jan M.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > "Jon Peltier" wrote:
>> >
>> >> What Jerry means is don't use a column chart. It is the wrong kind of
>> >> chart
>> >> to use to show relationships between two variables, even if you are
>> >> not
>> >> trying to generate statistics on it. Rebuild the chart and select one
>> >> of
>> >> the
>> >> XY subtypes in step 1 of the chart wizard, or convert the chart using
>> >> Chart
>> >> Type on the Chart menu. There's no need to mess around with the data
>> >> range.
>> >>
>> >> - Jon
>> >> -------
>> >> Jon Peltier, Microsoft Excel MVP
>> >> Peltier Technical Services
>> >> Tutorials and Custom Solutions
>> >> http://PeltierTech.com/
>> >> _______
>> >>
>> >> "Jan M." <JanM@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> >> news:F53C98AA-0D52-4238-B05C-8139A27C7B3E@microsoft.com...
>> >> > Jerry,
>> >> >
>> >> > I think I've figured out what your meant by "xy scatter"!
>> >> > I modified my data table the following way and got the right
>> >> > results:
>> >> >
>> >> > X Y
>> >> > 73 6.6
>> >> > 74
>> >> > 75
>> >> > 76
>> >> > 77
>> >> > 78 5.8
>> >> > ... ...
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks for your help.
>> >> >
>> >> > Jan M.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > "Jerry W. Lewis" wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Use an "XY (Scatter)" chart.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> When you selected a "Line" chart, you (by definition) told Excel
>> >> >> that
>> >> >> your
>> >> >> x-axis was categorical instead of numeric, and that what you
>> >> >> provided
>> >> >> for
>> >> >> the
>> >> >> x-axis was a set of category labels that may or may not have
>> >> >> numeric
>> >> >> values.
>> >> >> Why Excel would offer to fit a trendline in that circumstance is a
>> >> >> mystery to
>> >> >> me, but when it does, it uses x-values of 1,2,3,... and correctly
>> >> >> calculates
>> >> >> the regression of y against those assumed x-values.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Jerry
>> >> >>
>> >> >> "Jan M." wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > Hi,
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > I created a bar chart in Excel from the following data:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > X Y
>> >> >> > 73 6.6
>> >> >> > 78 5.7
>> >> >> > 86 4.8
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > The SLOPE and the INTERCEPT functions returned -0.136 and 16.4448
>> >> >> > respectively. The resulting equation is Y = -0.136X + 16.448
>> >> >> > which
>> >> >> > seems good
>> >> >> > enough to me.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Then I added a linear trendline to the chart. Excel displayed the
>> >> >> > following
>> >> >> > equation: Y = -0.9X + 7.5, R ^2 =1 which is way off (and it's not
>> >> >> > a
>> >> >> > rounding
>> >> >> > problem)!!!
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > The data seemed farly linear to me, how come Excel can't come up
>> >> >> > with
>> >> >> > the
>> >> >> > right equation???
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Thanks
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Jan M.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>

>>
>>
>>

13. Re: Linear trendline:wrong equation

Oh my GOD. Thank you. I have been struggling with this for weeks now. I registered on this site just to say thank you.

Originally Posted by Jerry W. Lewis
Use an "XY (Scatter)" chart.

When you selected a "Line" chart, you (by definition) told Excel that your
x-axis was categorical instead of numeric, and that what you provided for the
x-axis was a set of category labels that may or may not have numeric values.
Why Excel would offer to fit a trendline in that circumstance is a mystery to
me, but when it does, it uses x-values of 1,2,3,... and correctly calculates
the regression of y against those assumed x-values.

Jerry

"Jan M." wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I created a bar chart in Excel from the following data:
>
> X Y
> 73 6.6
> 78 5.7
> 86 4.8
>
> The SLOPE and the INTERCEPT functions returned -0.136 and 16.4448
> respectively. The resulting equation is Y = -0.136X + 16.448 which seems good
> enough to me.
>
> Then I added a linear trendline to the chart. Excel displayed the following
> equation: Y = -0.9X + 7.5, R ^2 =1 which is way off (and it's not a rounding
> problem)!!!
>
> The data seemed farly linear to me, how come Excel can't come up with the
> right equation???
>
> Thanks
>
> Jan M.
>
>

14. Re: Linear trendline:wrong equation

dboyallstars , welcome to the forum

Thank you for the feedback, always appreciated

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

• You may not post new threads
• You may not post replies
• You may not post attachments
• You may not edit your posts

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 RC 1