+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Aggregate Max versus Aggregate Large

  1. #1
    Forum Guru
    Join Date
    08-05-2004
    Location
    NJ
    MS-Off Ver
    365
    Posts
    13,582

    Aggregate Max versus Aggregate Large

    With a series in A1:A10 of strings where the last 2 characters are numbers,
    why does this work
    Formula: copy to clipboard
    Please Login or Register  to view this content.

    but this doesn't
    Formula: copy to clipboard
    Please Login or Register  to view this content.
    ?

    Thanks in advance
    ChemistB
    My 2?

    substitute commas with semi-colons if your region settings requires
    Don't forget to mark threads as "Solved" (Edit First post>Advanced>Change Prefix)
    If I helped, Don't forget to add to my reputation (click on the little star at bottom of this post)

    Forum Rules: How to use code tags, mark a thread solved, and keep yourself out of trouble

  2. #2
    Forum Expert XOR LX's Avatar
    Join Date
    04-18-2013
    Location
    Turin, Italy
    MS-Off Ver
    Office 365
    Posts
    7,742

    Re: Aggregate Max versus Aggregate Large

    Hi ChemistB,

    Not sure why MS designed it so, but only with a function_num parameter of 14 and above will AGGREGATE accept arrays (including those, as in your example, which are derived 'in-formula' via some other construction).

    Regards
    Click * below if this answer helped

    Advanced Excel Techniques: http://excelxor.com/

  3. #3
    Forum Guru Bo_Ry's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-10-2018
    Location
    Thailand
    MS-Off Ver
    MS 365
    Posts
    7,211

    Re: Aggregate Max versus Aggregate Large

    There are 2 types of Syntax
    Function num 1-13 is for Reference form

    AGGREGATE(function_num, options, ref1, [ref2], …)
    Ref refer to range only

    Function num 14-19 is for Array form
    AGGREGATE(function_num, options, array, [k])
    array can be array, range, array constant

  4. #4
    Forum Guru
    Join Date
    08-05-2004
    Location
    NJ
    MS-Off Ver
    365
    Posts
    13,582

    Re: Aggregate Max versus Aggregate Large

    Thanks, I figured it was a design thing but wanted to make sure I wasn't missing something obvious.

+ Reply to Thread

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Aggregate Help
    By mike2246 in forum Excel General
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-24-2020, 01:45 AM
  2. AGGREGATE vs LARGE. Efficiency comparison
    By tim201110 in forum The Water Cooler
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-27-2017, 11:53 AM
  3. Aggregate by ID in DAX
    By JB_100 in forum Excel Formulas & Functions
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-22-2017, 02:35 AM
  4. Trying to aggregate numbers in VBA
    By Pianoman23 in forum Excel Programming / VBA / Macros
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-15-2016, 03:04 AM
  5. How to aggregate data?
    By bumblebee88 in forum Excel General
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-21-2012, 04:14 PM
  6. Aggregate error
    By TomBP in forum Access Tables & Databases
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12-15-2010, 04:52 PM
  7. Best way to aggregate?
    By gnome_core in forum Excel Programming / VBA / Macros
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-03-2009, 04:38 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 RC 1