+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Looking up the results from the function "LARGE"

  1. #1
    Kirk
    Guest

    Looking up the results from the function "LARGE"

    Hello,

    I have an array that I'm using LARGE to find the top ten values. I want to
    use VLOOKUP, or what ever else suits, on these top ten values to find other
    values in the array. This works fine until the top ten that LARGE yields has
    2 or more values the same. How would I eliminate a value that has already
    been returned/looked up in order to find the next in line?

    Thanks for your time?

  2. #2
    Eli Shichrur
    Guest

    RE: Looking up the results from the function "LARGE"

    sort the data and insert new field that grow in 1 only if the astimated data
    grows
    use vlookup from 1 to 10 on the new fied

    "Kirk" wrote:

    > Hello,
    >
    > I have an array that I'm using LARGE to find the top ten values. I want to
    > use VLOOKUP, or what ever else suits, on these top ten values to find other
    > values in the array. This works fine until the top ten that LARGE yields has
    > 2 or more values the same. How would I eliminate a value that has already
    > been returned/looked up in order to find the next in line?
    >
    > Thanks for your time?


  3. #3
    Max
    Guest

    Re: Looking up the results from the function "LARGE"

    "Kirk" wrote:
    > I have an array that I'm using LARGE to find the top ten values. I want to
    > use VLOOKUP, or what ever else suits, on these top ten values to find other
    > values in the array. This works fine until the top ten that LARGE yields has
    > 2 or more values the same. How would I eliminate a value that has already
    > been returned/looked up in order to find the next in line?


    One way ..
    Try this sample from my archives collection (full details inside):
    http://savefile.com/files/5659668
    Simple Auto-Sort Example.xls
    (Auto-sort table in descending order)
    --
    Max
    Singapore
    http://savefile.com/projects/236895
    xdemechanik
    ---

  4. #4
    Kirk
    Guest

    Re: Looking up the results from the function "LARGE"

    Thanks people, but i'm using large to find to the top ten of 5 different KPIs
    which i then plan to graph along with the value i'm looking up. At the
    moment I'm sorting which is what i'm trying to avoid because the graphs
    change each time i sort.

    "Max" wrote:

    > "Kirk" wrote:
    > > I have an array that I'm using LARGE to find the top ten values. I want to
    > > use VLOOKUP, or what ever else suits, on these top ten values to find other
    > > values in the array. This works fine until the top ten that LARGE yields has
    > > 2 or more values the same. How would I eliminate a value that has already
    > > been returned/looked up in order to find the next in line?

    >
    > One way ..
    > Try this sample from my archives collection (full details inside):
    > http://savefile.com/files/5659668
    > Simple Auto-Sort Example.xls
    > (Auto-sort table in descending order)
    > --
    > Max
    > Singapore
    > http://savefile.com/projects/236895
    > xdemechanik
    > ---


  5. #5
    Max
    Guest

    Re: Looking up the results from the function "LARGE"

    The sample illustrates using an arb. tiebreaker in the criteria col which
    enables a full descending sort of the entire source table to be extracted
    elsewhere, inclusive ties / multiple ties, if any occurs. You could then
    point to (& graph) or read off the top "10" in the extract. Think you could
    also point your downstream VLOOKUP or INDEX/MATCH formulas at another key col
    with unique values in the extract, eg KPI#?, KPI description?, etc instead of
    the scores/points col used in the descending sort.
    --
    Max
    Singapore
    http://savefile.com/projects/236895
    xdemechanik
    ---
    "Kirk" wrote:
    > Thanks people, but i'm using large to find to the top ten of 5 different KPIs
    > which i then plan to graph along with the value i'm looking up. At the
    > moment I'm sorting which is what i'm trying to avoid because the graphs
    > change each time i sort.


  6. #6
    Kirk
    Guest

    Re: Looking up the results from the function "LARGE"

    Ok, Thanks for your help Max

    "Max" wrote:

    > The sample illustrates using an arb. tiebreaker in the criteria col which
    > enables a full descending sort of the entire source table to be extracted
    > elsewhere, inclusive ties / multiple ties, if any occurs. You could then
    > point to (& graph) or read off the top "10" in the extract. Think you could
    > also point your downstream VLOOKUP or INDEX/MATCH formulas at another key col
    > with unique values in the extract, eg KPI#?, KPI description?, etc instead of
    > the scores/points col used in the descending sort.
    > --
    > Max
    > Singapore
    > http://savefile.com/projects/236895
    > xdemechanik
    > ---
    > "Kirk" wrote:
    > > Thanks people, but i'm using large to find to the top ten of 5 different KPIs
    > > which i then plan to graph along with the value i'm looking up. At the
    > > moment I'm sorting which is what i'm trying to avoid because the graphs
    > > change each time i sort.


  7. #7
    Max
    Guest

    Re: Looking up the results from the function "LARGE"

    "Kirk" wrote:
    > Ok, Thanks for your help Max


    You're welcome, Kirk
    --
    Max
    Singapore
    http://savefile.com/projects/236895
    xdemechanik
    ---

+ Reply to Thread

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 RC 1