Fair enough -- that does get to the basic idea of what I'm looking for. Another question, though one that's less functionally important: is there a way to change the syntax of the function to reflect the Table and Column names? For example, the formula currently includes:
Formula:
=IFERROR(INDEX($J$3:$J$9,MATCH(0,COUNTIF($N$2:N8,$J$3:$J$9),0)),"")
I know that I can at least do this much to the formula, and get the same result:
Formula:
=IFERROR(INDEX(Project_Database[Team],MATCH(0,COUNTIF($N$2:N2,Project_Database[Team]),0)),"")
Is there a way to change the syntax of the $N$2:N2 range so that it uses the same Table format? I'm asking for two reasons: (a) I need to make this spreadsheet "fool proof" (i.e. boss proof), and thus need to make all formulas as easily readable as they can be, and (b) to more thoroughly understand your approach.
[EDIT: I didn't see Tony's previous post before I wrote this in my response:]
I'm still open to any takers who think they can solve the original question. I think this is a case like the famous "unsolvable statistics problem" -- using regular lines of thinking we might not arrive at the answer, but with some fancy footwork we can solve what we once thought to be unsolvable.
Otherwise, I'd love to hear an explanation/description of why it's impossible. Does it have to do with the way that ranges look up data, store it, etc? Genuinely curious, as I think it would help expand my understanding (and anyone else who is pursuing the same question, which I've seen asked in a number of places).
Bookmarks