Hi Guys,
I work in a contracting company that supplies things. I made a big workbook with a worksheet that has multiple tables. I am thinking that may have been a less than ideal approach but open to suggestions. The main reason for having all on one is across the top I have "positions" so on a project I can just populate the number of pieces of equipment we need for each position and have it sum in a column on the left.
The issue I keep running into is I look a the job, I populate the main area with counts. I then want to filter out any rows in each table that are "Blank". I do that, in this example I go to item type on row 99. I filter and get unintended results. Then I select a filter to check mark "Select All" thinking I should see all rows. But some rows are still hidden. Say in this example 215, 217-231, etc.
Is this an operator error? Would there be a better approach to doing this? Basically I ideally want one big sheet I can layout columns of different positions/locations and populate the items needed. Each table is a "category" of items. Honestly I'd probably like to add 2-3 more table on the same sheet. I then want to be able to filter out all rows in each table that do not have any values in them to more easily see what is needed on a given job.
I thought this was a good/correct approach but it keeps giving me odd results and I find rows with values are missing or vice versa.
Any help is appreciated.
Thanks
Matt
Bookmarks