Hi,
The question as originally posed appears to me to be a fairly difficult problem. I suspect that it's possible to provide a simple 'good 'nuf' solution, but some more information is needed. So, let me pose a few possible solutions along with my suspicions of how they are inadequate.
Possible solution 1: copy rows 1-18000 into NewSheet1, 18001 - 36000 into NewSheet2, 36001 - 54000 into NewSheet3.
Potential problem; certain 'chunks' of account have different typical values associated with them. For example, accounts starting with '01' might typically be a few hundred pounds(Euros?), while accounts starting with '9' might typically be a few million pounds.
Possible solution 2: Copy each 3rd row to a new sheet. In a blank column, enter the formula
and using the auto filter copy/paste the rows with each of three values into three new worksheets.
Potential Problem: While this helps remove the effects of clustered 'chunks', and the relative size of each total will approach parity, the absolute difference will increase as the number of rows increase.
Possible solution 3: Sort the sheet by the values (descinding). In a blank column, enter the formula
Then, using the autofilter, copy/paste the rows contating 0 or 5 into NewSheet1, 1 or 4 into NewSheet2, and 2 or 3 into NewSheet3. Same problems as solution 2, but the absolute and relative differences should be smaller.
Hopefully, one of these methods provides an adequate solution: I'm not sure if I'm up for solving the problem as originally stated
Bookmarks