This topic/issue may have already been discussed but I was unable to find anything, so I apologize if this is a repeat of something already on the forum.
While this may have already been discussed, I have been disgusted with Excel for a few years now...
First of all, I consider myself to be an advanced Excel user. I use it almost daily. I make extensive use of macros and UserForms. To put it mildly - I LOVE Excel!
That is, I used to love it ... until Microsoft (in all their wisdom) decided to "fix" it. Excel 2010 (and beyond) is a piece of trash. They have taken many things that worked well and were familiar and made them work poorly and hard-to-find. It has become what I consider "other" spreadsheet programs to be: Excel wannabes.
That's right, Excel 2010 is now an Excel wannabe!
Excel XP (also known as Excel 2003) was almost perfect. Sure, it needed some help. But, it did what it did well and it was rock-solid & easy to use. It was easy to find functions in the few menus listed at the top of the screen. It now takes me sometimes several minutes to find things. It has become a bloated, user-UNfriendly piece of garbage.
One of my complaints had to do with headers and footers:
When "adding" a header or footer to a worksheet, you used to go to "View -> Header and Footer..." This made perfect sense to most people. Even if you haven't typed anything into a footer, for instance, the footer already existed ... it was just blank. So, if you wanted to enter something into the footer, you had to view it first. Hence, "Header and Footer..." was listed under the "View" menu.
That is no longer the case. Now, it is listed under the "Insert" menu. This seems to make sense at first. The thinking may go like this: "I haven't created a footer yet, so I want to insert one." This is a major change in thinking for people who have been using Excel for decades. The footer ALREADY EXISTS!!!! What's worse, is once you have typed something into the footer (or header) and you decide later that you want to change that text, most people would think that they either needed to EDIT the footer or VIEW the footer in order to make the changes. This thinking would lead the user to either the "Edit" or "View" menu. However, you need to go to the "Insert" menu! Why would you go to the "Insert" menu to edit something that already exists!
Well it would be confusing if they moved the "Header and Footer..." selection from one menu to another, based on the existence of a header or footer, wouldn't it?
What's confusing is that they moved it at all! They should have left it where it was.
I have similar complaints about almost every aspect of the newer versions of Excel. In fact, I find it so painful to use, that I avoid it at all costs (whenever possible). My wife is forced to use the 2010 version at her workplace and I do a lot of work for her. But I REFUSE to use her computer. Instead, I have her put her work in her Dropbox, and I work on it on MY computer with the XP version that I've come to know and love. (Of course, this brings on many "Compatibilty" issues, so I have to make sure she doesn't use any features that didn't exist prior to the 2010 version.)
About the only "improvement" or good thing that I can say about the newer versions is that they finally lifted the 3-condition limit that existed for conditional formatting. But, even this has its problems... I recently worked on a spreadsheet (I was forced to use 2010 at the time) that had 3 conditional formatting formulas per cell in several columns. I changed the formula for the conditional formatting in one cell then, using "Paste Special...," I copied that formatting to the rest of the cells in the same column. This worked fine. But then, I copied all of the cells in that column and used "Paste Special..." to update the conditional formatting in other columns. The result was that the cells in the other columns ended up with SIX conditional formatting formulas ... the 3 old ones AND the 3 new ones. I didn't realize this until months later when I was editing the data in the chart and found that the conditional formatting wasn't working as expected.
The newest screw-up I've discovered is in regard to referenced cells. In my example, I had a cell that was essentially a title to the chart below it. It was a dynamic title that included a year listed in another cell (so that changes only needed to be made in one place). For example, I had the value "2012" cell W7. In cell B4, I had the following formula:
=W7 & " Statistics"
Cells B4 through G4 had been merged into one cell. When I changed the value in cell W7 from "2012" to "2013", you would expect the title in cell B4 (B4 through G4) to now read "2013 Statistics" But that didn't happen. My first guess was that the cell calculations where in "Manual" mode, but that wasn't the case. What's worse, is that I had a similar formula in merged cells J4 through M4 that referenced cell W14. The title in cell J4 (through G4) updated instantly when the value in cell W14 was changed. What I found was that if ANY part of the merged cell was not visible at the time the referenced cell was changed, the formula didn't update live ... you had to bring the ENITRE cell into view (in this case B4 through G4) and then refresh the data in order for the formula to update.
They even ruined the help feature!
To Microsoft, I ask, "Have you not heard the saying, 'If it ain't broke, don't fix it'?"
Suffice it to say, that I will continue using Excel XP/2003 for as long as possible.
Bookmarks