Thank you for your response NeedForExcel. Unfortunately, the answer provided, while useful for Excel, is not useable in MS Access, the forum for which being where I posted this thread. But I thank you for the effort nonetheless.
For those interested in the answer to this question, I came upon a query design. It looks like this:
This query works exactly as intended. However, it might be somewhat too slow for the large number of fields, for a large database.
I can use this in the meantime but if anybody can provide a better query, I'd certainly like to hear it. (An Access query, to clarify the application)
Bookmarks