You need some moderately involved calculations.
If (x2,y2) including labels in top row were in A4:B38 and (x1,y1) including labels in left column were in B1:L2, then
A1:
A2:
C5:
Copy C5, paste into C5:L38. That becomes an array of scaled distances between points in the respective data sets. Scaling is necessary given the differences in scale between x and y coordinates.
The smallest difference corresponds to (0.66,181.5) from the 1st data set and (0.7,110) from the 2nd data set. You'd need to complete a rectangle with (0.69,198.375) from the 1st data set (point with x-axis value closer to the 2nd data set base point) and (0.6,331) from the 2nd data set (point with x-axis value closer to the previous 1st data set base point). You could then just use the intersection of the segments from (0.66,181.5) to (0.69,198.375) and from (0.6,331) to (0.7,110). The 1st is given by y = 562.5 x - 189.75 and the 2nd by y = -2210 x + 1657, where m1 = 562.5 = (198.375 - 181.5) / (0.69 - 0.66), b1 = -189.75 = 181.5 - m1 0.66, m2 = -2210 = (110 - 331) / (0.7 - 0.6), and b2 = 1675 = 331 - m2 0.6. The intersection is given by xi = (b2-b1)/(m1-m2) = 0.666095582 and yi = m1 xi + b1 = m2 xi + b2 = 184.9287647.
This is approximate, but it may be sufficient for your purposes.
Given the C5:L38 grid, the row index of the minimum value is given by the array formula
C41:
and the column index by the array formula
C42:
The 4 points are then given by
D41:
E41:
D42:
E42:
D44:
E44:
D45:
E45:
Slopes and intercepts by
F41 (m1):
F42 (b1):
F44 (m2):
F45 (b2):
and the intersection point by
D47 (xi):
E47 (yi calculated with m1 and b1):
F47 (yi calculated with m2 and b2):
Bookmarks