+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Excel Chart

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    03-29-2007
    Location
    Las Cruces, NM
    Posts
    3

    Question Excel Chart

    I am totally frustrated trying to do something simple with Excel. I cant get the chart feature to show a graph similar to a "U" or hyperbola----when I enter the following numbers, I get two lines, not a curve---

    27.000
    27.736 2.0
    28.463 1.5
    29.700
    29.947 2.0
    The graph should be a slight "U" shaped curve, with the items in column A on the bottom, left to right.
    I sure could use a bit of assistance.

    bill in las cruces

    I know the answer is really simple, but I can't figure it out today!

  2. #2
    Forum Contributor
    Join Date
    03-13-2005
    Posts
    6,195
    Quote Originally Posted by K5ILF
    I am totally frustrated trying to do something simple with Excel. I cant get the chart feature to show a graph similar to a "U" or hyperbola----when I enter the following numbers, I get two lines, not a curve---

    27.000
    27.736 2.0
    28.463 1.5
    29.700
    29.947 2.0
    The graph should be a slight "U" shaped curve, with the items in column A on the bottom, left to right.
    I sure could use a bit of assistance.

    bill in las cruces

    I know the answer is really simple, but I can't figure it out today!
    Hi,

    totally unsure.

    the only way I can see that you would make a U shape is to (assuming those figures are in A1:B5) in B1 put 3, and in B4 put 1.3 then in C1 put =A1*B1 and formula fill that downwards, then line-chart C1:C5 and set the Data series to Smooth Line.

    hth
    ---
    Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere.

  3. #3
    Registered User
    Join Date
    03-29-2007
    Location
    Las Cruces, NM
    Posts
    3

    Help with Excel

    Thanks Brian for the reply: I don't think I am describing the problem very well. Perhaps if I tell you that this graph is a description of frequency versus SWR (standing wave). It is so simple that it has become difficult! The frequency between 27.736 mHz and 29.947 mHz has the lowest SWR at 28.463 mHz which is 1.5. At the frequencies of 27.736 mHz and 29.947 mHz the SWR is 2.0 The graph should have the frequency across the bottom and the SWR up the left side. The graph would have 3 points indicated and connected with a smooth line. I know I am not describing it well, but it seems that the most simple is the most complicated sometimes. I hope I have not confused you. I really appreciate your response. Thank you.

    bill in las cruces

  4. #4
    Forum Guru
    Join Date
    04-13-2005
    Location
    North America
    MS-Off Ver
    2002/XP and 2007
    Posts
    15,837
    What kind of chart are you using? I expect you want an XY scatter plot (which uses numeric X data), and are somehow getting a Line chart (which uses categorical "x data"). And, for whatever reason, when you create the Line chart, Excel assumes you have two different series to plot against its default category set (1,2,3,...). The first thing I would suggest is to make sure you are using the appropriate chart for the application.

  5. #5
    Forum Contributor
    Join Date
    03-13-2005
    Posts
    6,195
    Quote Originally Posted by K5ILF
    Thanks Brian for the reply: I don't think I am describing the problem very well. Perhaps if I tell you that this graph is a description of frequency versus SWR (standing wave). It is so simple that it has become difficult! The frequency between 27.736 mHz and 29.947 mHz has the lowest SWR at 28.463 mHz which is 1.5. At the frequencies of 27.736 mHz and 29.947 mHz the SWR is 2.0 The graph should have the frequency across the bottom and the SWR up the left side. The graph would have 3 points indicated and connected with a smooth line. I know I am not describing it well, but it seems that the most simple is the most complicated sometimes. I hope I have not confused you. I really appreciate your response. Thank you.

    bill in las cruces
    Hi,
    so you are charting the Standing Wave Ratio against the frequency, but your original figures showed the SWR for only 3 readings, hardly enough to be able to plot anything except a lne.

    If you complete the other two readings and then use the SWR as the Y and the frequency as the x, and set the line to 'Smooth' then you should go close,

    see the attached

    added, you need to add the category x labels as A2:A6

    ---
    Attached Files Attached Files

  6. #6
    Registered User
    Join Date
    03-29-2007
    Location
    Las Cruces, NM
    Posts
    3

    Thanks

    Thanks Brian and all, I finally had a mental break-though and realize what I was, or was NOT, doing. I was using the wrong type of chart. Thank you so much.

    bill in las cruces

  7. #7
    Forum Contributor
    Join Date
    03-13-2005
    Posts
    6,195
    Quote Originally Posted by K5ILF
    Thanks Brian and all, I finally had a mental break-though and realize what I was, or was NOT, doing. I was using the wrong type of chart. Thank you so much.

    bill in las cruces
    good to see your problemn resolved, and thanks for the response.

    ---
    Attached Files Attached Files
    Last edited by Bryan Hessey; 04-10-2007 at 07:37 PM.

+ Reply to Thread

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 RC 1