The formula is summing U14 and U26 etc. The first cell is U14 because your data starts in U3. With U3 being the first value, the 12th value is U14. (Count them if you like) The next values are in U26, U36, U48 etc.
I prefer to use this form of the formula because I just find it easier. (entered in T3)
If Ron Coderre's formula was written like this and entered in W3 the Rows($2:3) would be equivalent to the 2 that I used. As you can see the results are identical. It is just a matter of choice.
Column V has the result of the formula
|
T |
U |
V |
W |
3 |
120 |
1 |
3 |
120 |
4 |
|
2 |
4 |
|
5 |
|
3 |
5 |
|
6 |
|
4 |
6 |
|
7 |
|
5 |
7 |
|
8 |
|
6 |
8 |
|
9 |
|
7 |
9 |
|
10 |
|
8 |
10 |
|
11 |
|
9 |
11 |
|
12 |
|
10 |
0 |
|
13 |
|
11 |
1 |
|
14 |
|
12 |
2 |
|
15 |
|
13 |
3 |
|
16 |
|
14 |
4 |
|
17 |
|
15 |
5 |
|
18 |
|
16 |
6 |
|
19 |
|
17 |
7 |
|
20 |
|
18 |
8 |
|
21 |
|
19 |
9 |
|
22 |
|
20 |
10 |
|
23 |
|
21 |
11 |
|
24 |
|
22 |
0 |
|
25 |
|
23 |
1 |
|
26 |
|
24 |
2 |
|
27 |
|
25 |
3 |
|
28 |
|
26 |
4 |
|
29 |
|
27 |
5 |
|
30 |
|
28 |
6 |
|
31 |
|
29 |
7 |
|
32 |
|
30 |
8 |
|
33 |
|
31 |
9 |
|
34 |
|
32 |
10 |
|
35 |
|
33 |
11 |
|
36 |
|
34 |
0 |
|
37 |
|
35 |
1 |
|
38 |
|
36 |
2 |
|
39 |
|
37 |
3 |
|
40 |
|
38 |
4 |
|
41 |
|
39 |
5 |
|
42 |
|
40 |
6 |
|
43 |
|
41 |
7 |
|
44 |
|
42 |
8 |
|
45 |
|
43 |
9 |
|
46 |
|
44 |
10 |
|
47 |
|
45 |
11 |
|
48 |
|
46 |
0 |
|
49 |
|
47 |
1 |
|
50 |
|
48 |
2 |
|
51 |
|
49 |
3 |
|
Bookmarks