+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Re: Non-random numbers generated by excel's data analysis random gener

  1. #1
    Harlan Grove
    Guest

    Re: Non-random numbers generated by excel's data analysis random gener

    Allie wrote...
    >I've been trying to generate random numbers using excel's random number
    >generator in the analysis toolpak. I'm using Uniform number generation
    >between 0 and 1, and I am using a random seed, as I would like to be able to
    >re-generate the same numbers in the future.
    >
    >Using seeds from 1 to 10, when i fill a range of 16 cells with random
    >numbers, the first cell filled is always the lowest. This is an extremely
    >unlikely circumstance with a true RN generator. I just wanted to raise this
    >flag, as it could be affecting others without their knowledge.


    First, this isn't the appropriate newsgroup for this detailed level of
    Excel functionality. You'd be better off posting in
    microsoft.public.excel.misc, to which I've cross-posted this reply.

    This is a know problem. See

    http://groups.google.com/group/micro...36f9fec558b658

    (or http://makeashorterlink.com/?G2C0129CB ).


  2. #2
    Allie
    Guest

    Re: Non-random numbers generated by excel's data analysis random g

    Thanks for your response, Harlan. Your link doesn't seem to be the same
    issue I am talking about here. The link says that large arrays can get
    non-random, and that there are repeat sequences within 500 tries. The
    apparent bug I noticed is not that.

    And apologies for posting in an inappropriate place.

    Allie

  3. #3
    Harlan Grove
    Guest

    Re: Non-random numbers generated by excel's data analysis random g

    "Allie" wrote...
    >Thanks for your response, Harlan. Your link doesn't seem to be
    >the same issue I am talking about here. The link says that large
    >arrays can get non-random, and that there are repeat sequences
    >within 500 tries. The apparent bug I noticed is not that.

    ....

    Not exactly the same, but another aspect of the poor quality of the
    pseudorandom number generator in the ATP. In short, it's unwise to use the
    ATP's random number generators for anything meaningful. Presumably Microsoft
    has aware of the problem for years, but they haven't fixed it. That's not a
    guarantee that they never will fix it, but it's pretty clear it's a very low
    priority.

    Another point made in the article I linked was Dave Braden's mention of
    alternatives. You really can't use the ATP with any reliance, so you need to
    find alternatives.



+ Reply to Thread

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 RC 1