+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2

Excel 2.007 drawbacks vs. Excel 2.003

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    04-01-2007
    Posts
    10

    Thumbs down Excel 2.007 drawbacks vs. Excel 2.003

    I have read some information that really scares me.

    It seems that Excel 2.003 is still superior to Excel 2.007

    The comparison table is here:
    http://www.add-ins.com/Excel%202003%20versus%202007.htm

    What do you think about it?

  2. #2
    Forum Contributor harrywaldron's Avatar
    Join Date
    05-24-2007
    Location
    Roanoke, VA
    MS-Off Ver
    Office Professional 2010 BETA
    Posts
    169

    Lightbulb

    Quote Originally Posted by rolito
    I have read some information that really scares me. It seems that Excel 2003 is still superior to Excel 2007

    The comparison table is here:
    http://www.add-ins.com/Excel%202003%20versus%202007.htm

    What do you think about it?

    Hi - First of all thanks for sharing, as I found some of the comparisons informative Some quick comments:

    1. While much of this appears and may be accurate, I'd suggest not using just one article (or a 1 page chart in this case) to evaluate a product. Maybe some of the reviews found in this quick search might offer differing opinions. I've certainly read some positive reviews also. I'd suggest searching PC Magazine, PC World, ZDnet, CNET, and other sites for a more comprehensive reivew than just a 1 page generalized chart. These links might help in your research:

    Google
    http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=excel+2007+review

    PC Magazine - Evaluation of Office 2007
    http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1895,2052255,00.asp

    PC World - Top 20 products of 2006
    Office 2007 receives receives most innovative product of year award
    http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,12...s/article.html

    PC World - Evaluation of Office 2007
    http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,128266/article.html

    PC World - Evaluation of each product in Office 2007
    http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,127919/article.html

    2. The vendor which did the comparison is selling add-in products which may be helpful. Still, they may even be selling something that O/2007 now covers? I think many of their factual comments are okay, but when they use terms like "some users report ..." I'm not certain if it's one, dozens, hundreds, etc. Their product may even work with O/2007 and I'm not suspecting a hidden agenda either. Still much of the review is slanted with no positive aspects for O/2007 at all -- and thus that raises suspicions.

    3. Personally, I'm most likely to stay with O/2003 Pro for a while at work. As an IT professional, I need to be compatible with the rest of my company (even though you can save to older formats in O/2007). Still, on the other hand, if I could switch to O/2007 I'd jump at the opportunity. I'd probably do so just for the learning experience and based on favorable reviews I've read elsewhere (even though I know I could get by with O/2003).

    4. As I've shared in Point #3, a company should perform due diligence in certification testing of their more complex Excel applications, so that they have assurances of compatibility with VBA or macro based code. If there are no driving business reasons to move to O/2007, then they should enjoy at least a few more years of good support.

    5. Companies definitely need to move away from O/2000 and O/XP as these older versions are either no longer supported or near end-of-life. I'd recommend folks moving to at least O/2003 as their standard Microsoft based Office suite
    Last edited by harrywaldron; 06-14-2007 at 10:06 AM.

+ Reply to Thread

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 RC 1