+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Which method of averaging for management reporting

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    07-02-2005
    Posts
    53

    Which method of averaging for management reporting

    Hi all, I have a question which I have been pondering on.

    Assuming the below performance report:

    Day 1
    Actual 1
    Target 1
    Achieve 1/1 = 100%

    Day 2
    Actual 1
    Target 1
    Achieve 1/1 = 100%

    Day 3
    Actual 9
    Target 10
    Achieve 9/10 = 90%

    Which method do you use to report the Achievement for the 3 days?
    1. Do you take the average of 100%,100%,90% to give 97%
    OR
    2. Do you sum Actual (Day1+Day2+Day3 = 11) / Target (Day1+Day2+Day3 =12) to give 92%

    Mods/Admins - please delete this thread if you think it is not appropriately posted. Thanks.
    Last edited by ernestgoh; 02-22-2010 at 03:08 PM.

  2. #2
    Forum Expert JBeaucaire's Avatar
    Join Date
    03-21-2004
    Location
    Bakersfield, CA
    MS-Off Ver
    2010, 2016, Office 365
    Posts
    33,492

    Re: Which method of averaging for management reporting

    Both answers are correct. Neither is better than the other.

    It's up to the management team to decide whether they want:

    1) An average of the daily results (97%)
    2) An average of the weekly activities (92%)


    Based on the way you phrased the question at the end, I'd think you would choose #2.
    _________________
    Microsoft MVP 2010 - Excel
    Visit: Jerry Beaucaire's Excel Files & Macros

    If you've been given good help, use the icon below to give reputation feedback, it is appreciated.
    Always put your code between code tags. [CODE] your code here [/CODE]

    ?None of us is as good as all of us? - Ray Kroc
    ?Actually, I *am* a rocket scientist.? - JB (little ones count!)

  3. #3
    Forum Guru
    Join Date
    08-26-2007
    Location
    London
    Posts
    4,606

    Re: Which method of averaging for management reporting

    You use the second method, which weights your average. Edit: well, ok JB is right, the first is not incorrect, but in my view the second is better.

  4. #4
    Registered User
    Join Date
    07-02-2005
    Posts
    53

    Re: Which method of averaging for management reporting

    True both methods are correct. However, I am actually more for method 2 as it looks at the business as a whole. I feel method 1 could be mis-leading (this is also our current practice now).
    Last edited by ernestgoh; 02-22-2010 at 02:23 PM.

  5. #5
    Forum Expert JBeaucaire's Avatar
    Join Date
    03-21-2004
    Location
    Bakersfield, CA
    MS-Off Ver
    2010, 2016, Office 365
    Posts
    33,492

    Re: Which method of averaging for management reporting

    It's only misleading if it hasn't been examined what the values being used currently actually mean. You're doing that now, so I imagine it will be reconciled with what your business wants to emphasize.

    =======
    If that takes care of your need, be sure to EDIT your original post, click Go Advanced and mark the PREFIX box [SOLVED].

    (Also, use the blue "scales" icon in our posts to leave Reputation Feedback, it is appreciated. It is found across from the "time" in each of our posts.)

+ Reply to Thread

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 RC 1