Hi Leith
Thank you for responding.
After the 2nd pass I expected the range oRngUnionAll to hold all of the following:
$C$2:$F$2,$U$2:$X$2,$AM$2:$AP$2,$BE$2:$BH$2,$BW$2:$BZ$2,$CO$2:$CR$2,$DG$2:$DJ$2,$DY$2:$EB$2,$EQ$2:$E T$2,$FI$2:$FL$2;$C$3:$F$3,$U$3:$X$3,$AM$3:$AP$3,$BE$3:$BH$3,$BW$3:$BZ$3,$CO$3:$CR$3,$DG$3:$DJ$3,$DY$3:$EB$3,$EQ$3:$E T$3,$FI$3:$FL$3
In reading your reply I think I've done a _DUH_ and missed the point that Excel has - in effect -
consolidated the ranges after the second pass. I believe this is what you are saying (?).
.
If correct then (a) Excel (range union) was always working correctly and (b) it is of no help
with respect to isolating each - what I will call range blocks - e.g. $C$2:$F$2 , $C$3:$F$3 in that
I need these isolated range blocks to build series data for a chart.
.
I have already built code to do the isolation but it is ugly and inefficient code.
.
Warning:This code will hurt your ears -g- and truncated so that I can post it
.
I am just not thinking clearly about this.
But thank you very much for pointing out that the Range Union was - if fact - working
correctly and efficiently.
regards
John
Bookmarks