Hi !
I've been wrapping my head around that issue for several hours and I can't seem to figure it out...
I'm torn between a very elegant setup (supereasy data analysis, superslow data entry), an elegant setup (easy data analysis, slow data entry) and a very ugly setup (fast data entry, painful data analysis). I hope there is a 4th option
In short: every day several items are tested. There are ~45 different items and each item receives two types of tests (A and B).
Let's call items I and types of test T
Items formats are for example: 6-435 ; 6-435 ; HTHV04032 ; .....
Results of Types of test are numbers (from 0 to ~400)
The very ugly setup with fast data entry is this one (column names):
Date - I1 TA - I1 TB - I2 TA - I2 TB - I3 TA - I3 TB - ............
Which is easy to navigate within (data entry can be made with arrows and numkeys alone, 1 date can contain several results, and you can have a paper form that matches the order in which columns are set up) but:
- really painful for calculations (e.g average results for type A will make me refer to a lot of columns)
- gives a super-large worksheet because of the item names and the need of having 2 columns per item.
The elegant setup would be (column names):
Date - TA - TB - I1 - I2 - I3 - I4 - I5 - .......................
Where you'd e.g put an "X" in the item that corresponds to the results.
This would make me need half the columns and make calculations easier but:
- Not very fast data entry: date has now to be entered everytime and.. well that alone is a big issue
The very elegant setup would be (column names):
Date - TA - TB - I
Where I is a data validation list and you have to find your item in there.
That makes calculations a piece of cake but slows even more data entry.
Any suggestion?
Bookmarks